www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk

Whisky Forum - Young vs. old

 

Whisky Forum

FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in
Young vs. old

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Whisky Forum Index -> Single Malt Whisky
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Alexppp
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 1791

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 5:32 pm    Post subject: Young vs. old Reply with quote

It's normally the case - within the 10-18 year range at least - that older whiskies tend to be more special than their younger siblings from the same distillery. But what examples can you think where in your opinion the younger is better? In my limited experience I find the 12 year-old Glenlivets (both the normal one and the First Fill) better than the 15 year-old. My dad also prefers Talisker 10 to the 18 year-old.

What about you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Carson
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Posts: 468

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The older expressions in general are more polished with the rough edges a young whisky can have buffed off, but youthful whisky can be every bit as enjoyable. One example of a young but still very much enjoyable whisky that i can think of is the Benromach Traditional, clearly a very young whisky. Good to compare with the more polished 10 year old.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crane
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 1345
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am drinking Springbank 18 tonight and i have to say it is way better than the 10 year old or CV. Definitely one of those distilleries that improves a lot with age.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SkyeIslay
Single Malt Member
Single Malt Member


Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting question. I prefer:

Laphroaig QC to Laphroaig 10
Glenlivet 12 to Glenlivet 15
Glenfiddich 15 to Glenfiddich 18
Bowmore 12 to Bowmore 18
Old Pulteney 12 to Old Pulteney 17
Balvenie Doublewood to Balvenie 17

But these tend to be exceptions rather than the rule. As Carson said older whiskies are smoother and more polished. I can see why your dad would prefer Talisker 10 to 18 for example, it's more aggressive and in-your-face. Nothing wrong with that, they're both excellent drams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DavidUK
Double Malt Member
Double Malt Member


Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old Pultenay 17 yo is much better than the 21yo.

Bladnoch 8yo and 18yo better than the 20yo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5-12-1908
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 22 Dec 2010
Posts: 307

PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to say I also prefer the Glenfiddich 15 to the 18.

Nothing wrong with the 18, but the 15 just fits my tastes better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

SkyeIslay
Single Malt Member
Single Malt Member


Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carson wrote:
The older expressions in general are more polished with the rough edges a young whisky can have buffed off, but youthful whisky can be every bit as enjoyable. One example of a young but still very much enjoyable whisky that i can think of is the Benromach Traditional, clearly a very young whisky. Good to compare with the more polished 10 year old.


Speaking of Benromach, does anyone know whether a 12 year-old release is coming soon? If I remember correctly the 10 year-old came out about two years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 1531
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeh i think the Benromach 10 has been about a couple of years now, not sure if they are planning a 12 year old expression or not, cant see any sign of a 12 year old on the Benromach web site.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alexppp
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 1791

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies so far. I've never tried a Benromach, but it's on my shortlist of things to buy next.

On young vs. old, I also like the Glenlivet 12 First Fill at least as much, if not more than the Glenlivet 18.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bower
New Member
New Member


Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Location: England

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have only had one bottle of the Glenlivet 12 First Fill and it was very good, i wish they would put it on general release instead of just travel retail. To be honest when i did buy it i actually thought it was the standard 12 i was buying so i was very pleasently surprised.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blackadder
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 1734
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I need to watch out for a bottle of the Glenlivet 12 First Fill.

It is the bottles that you dont find in the duty free/travel retail that annoys me. Such as Highland Park 18, you now only see the HP vintages also you never see Lagavulin 16 always seems to be just the Lagavulin Distillers Edition although it is very good it would be nice to be able to pick up the standard 16 year old but it never seems to be in the duty free shops i pass through.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alexppp
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 1791

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blackadder wrote:
I need to watch out for a bottle of the Glenlivet 12 First Fill.

It is the bottles that you dont find in the duty free/travel retail that annoys me. Such as Highland Park 18, you now only see the HP vintages also you never see Lagavulin 16 always seems to be just the Lagavulin Distillers Edition although it is very good it would be nice to be able to pick up the standard 16 year old but it never seems to be in the duty free shops i pass through.


That's a pity about the HP18 and the Lagavulin 16. They're two of my favourites and both pretty expensive at the moment. Could do with 1 litre bottles at duty-free prices. Still, I'm really looking forward to trying the Lagavulin Distillers Edition next time I pass through an airport!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Blackadder
Master Of Malts
Master Of Malts


Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 1734
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 1 litre bottles is often what attracts me to my duty free purchases as they are great value. I think the Lagavulin Distillers Edition is £45 at the airport for a 1 litre bottle so a great buy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Whisky Forum Index -> Single Malt Whisky All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 Drink Safely   Add Your Site   Other Whisky Sites    Links   Contact Us 

 

© 2026 www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk All rights reserved.

This website was produced in Scotland.