| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Woodwynd Double Malt Member

Joined: 20 Mar 2011 Posts: 155 Location: Ayrshire
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:58 am Post subject: Aberlour abunadh |
|
|
I'm afraid I'm not a connoisseur , is there much of a difference in the batches of abunadh , I have tasted four or five different batches myself and as I remember they were all great whiskys ! Are they consistent in strength and taste , any opinions welcome!
Cheers Alan.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
Bookie Master Of Malts

Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 945
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alan by its very nature each batch will vary, no 2 batches will ever be identical. All that i have tried have been ok and some very good. Very good batches IMO are batch 19, 20, 23, 26, 28, 29 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Master Of Malts


Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1531 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| More recently batches 32, 34 and 35 were very good but i recall 30 wasnt so good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Master Of Malts

Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 1664
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The best 3 abunadhs i have had are batch 14, 20 and 29
i thought 25, 27 and 32 wasnt so good.
More recently 33 and 34 being the most recent bottlings i have tried were good, but if i was to choose between the 2 of them 34.
Not sure what release they are up to now but batch 34 is the latest one i have tried.
Cheers
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nitram Double Malt Member

Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 149 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark wrote: | The best 2 abunadhs i have had are batch 14, 20 and 29
Mark |
Mark,
How much of those 2 (14,20 and 29) did you drink exactly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Master Of Malts

Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 1664
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nitram wrote: | | Mark wrote: | The best 2 abunadhs i have had are batch 14, 20 and 29
Mark |
Mark,
How much of those 2 (14,20 and 29) did you drink exactly? | i did only post batch 20 and 29 but then i recalled that 14 was excellent also and edited my post, but obviously i didnt edit very well, and i havent had a drop today. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
nitram Double Malt Member

Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 149 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[/quote] i havent had a drop today.[/quote]
there's the problem then! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Master Of Malts

Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 1664
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i havent had a drop today.[/quote]
there's the problem then![/quote]You may be right, i will remedy that later this evening  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jcarrick Master Of Malts

Joined: 18 Apr 2011 Posts: 949
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree Mark batch 14, 20 and 29 were amongst the best so far
the most recent bottling i have is batch 34 and it is very good indeed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woodwynd Double Malt Member

Joined: 20 Mar 2011 Posts: 155 Location: Ayrshire
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I enjoyed batch 34 so its good that a few of yous agree, my taste can't be that bad then !
It was a bottle of batch 34 I sent to grant m this morning for winning the competition I ran on the forum recently , at least he's getting one of the better ones.
Cheers Alan.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William Administrator


Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 4056 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lucky Grant batch 34 is a good one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newwhiskyworld Single Malt Member

Joined: 03 Jan 2011 Posts: 43 Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I recently had Batch 35 in Elgin and then 36 at the Whisky Lounge event. Both excellent and none of the sulpher which is the main concern. Anyone done comparisons of several batches at the same time? _________________ Jonny
http://distillerytasting.co.uk
www.newwhiskyworld.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
chrisg Double Malt Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 197
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| newwhiskyworld wrote: | | I recently had Batch 35 in Elgin and then 36 at the Whisky Lounge event. Both excellent and none of the sulpher which is the main concern. Anyone done comparisons of several batches at the same time? | I have never had more than 2 different batches opened at any one time, usually when one bottle is coming to an end and just starting the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alexppp Master Of Malts

Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, random question about the A'bunadh: on the box and the bottle it says 'single cask maturation' but is that true? I read online that it's blended from different barrels, and also if it were single cask wouldn't it carry the cask number?
So are Aberlour 'cheating' a bit or do they mean it's made in the style of single cask bottlings without actually being single cask? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Master Of Malts


Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1531 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex i always understood the Aberlour a'bunadh was a small batch bottling, meaning a small number of casks are blended together. It is bottled at natural cask strength with no chill filtration. I assume they add a bit of colouring as Aberlour are known to use it, but i cant say it is noticeable.
I agree the new packaging which they brought out around Batch 30 (i think it was) causes a bit of confusion with its statement "SINGLE CASK MATURATION" but then it says "IN SPANISH OLOROSSO SHERRY BUTTS" the use of the word "BUTTS" plural tells us there was more than one cask going into the batch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|