| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Alexppp Master Of Malts

Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:17 pm Post subject: Top 'ordinary' malts |
|
|
When you don't want to be blown away by smoke or sherry, or cask-strength richness, when you don't feel like drinking something complex or be challenged by something new - what single malts do you turn to? 'Ordinary' is perhaps the wrong word, I just mean the nice, simple, enjoyable drams we have when we're not in the mood for something particularly special or for a big drinking night.
Personally, I realise it now that I don't have a bottle, but I'm often in the mood for a Glenlivet 12. Aberfeldy 12 is another one I'd like to have for moments like these. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
Bookie Master Of Malts

Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 945
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For me when i am looking to have an enjoyable single malt that isnt a peat monster or sherry monster and are very good value for money whiskies i go for one of the big 3 Glens, Glenmorangie 10, Glenfiddich 12 and Glenlivet 12. By no means would i call any of them ordinary, just very easy to drink enjoyable whiskies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rochdale Pioneers Single Malt Member

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 Posts: 22 Location: Stockton on Tees, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Drinking Glenmorangie 10 now - fabulous stuff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James T Master Of Malts

Joined: 05 Feb 2011 Posts: 2963
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apart from the big 3 Glens - Glenmorangie 10, Glenfiddich 12 and Glenlivet 12 when i am looking for a enjoyable decent dram which isnt too heavy in smoke or sherry i would often have one of these - Macallan 10 Fine Oak, Glengoyne 10, Old Pulteney 12, Balvenie Signature, Arran 14, Glengoyne 10, Balblair 2001, AnCnoc 12. All outstanding drams IMO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Mac Master Of Malts

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 2216 Location: USA - Formerly Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think many whisky drinkers get hooked on the more intense in your face characters of the heavily smoky and heavily sherried whiskies and can sometimes forget that there are some excellent subtle but still very complex whiskies also.
Some very good examples of subtle yet complex whiskies which have already been mentioned above are Glenmorangie 10, Glenfiddich 12, Glenlivet 12 and AnCnoc 12 which rarely gets much of a mention |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Master Of Malts


Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1531 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I do enjoy the An Cnoc 12, its a lovely fresh Speyside malt which hasnt got a bit sherry influence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
chrisg Double Malt Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 197
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have to say over the years the 3 whiskies which i have probably drunk most of are the big 3 Glens, Glenmorangie 10, Glenfiddich 12 and Glenlivet 12. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Mac Master Of Malts

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 2216 Location: USA - Formerly Scotland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alex if i was to name one top ordinary malt it would be Glenmorangie 10 with Glenfiddich 12 as a close 2nd. For your money the Glenmorangie 10 is a hugely complex and very enjoyable malt whisky which you can pick up for a decent price |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidUK Double Malt Member

Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bladnoch
Bruichladdich
AnCnoc |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quaich1 Master Of Malts


Joined: 21 Apr 2012 Posts: 5749 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My standby single malt scotch when I just want to return to an old friend is usually Glenmorangie the Original or Aberlour 10yrs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ant Member

Joined: 04 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting question, really speaks to our personal tastes. I simply do not enjoy non-smokey scotches the way I did when I was younger. In my early-mid 20's, I would've said Glenlivet, Glenfiddich, and Macallan. In my late 20's, Highland Park or Talisker.
But now, when I want something "ordinary" I interpret that as "smokey - not cask strength". So for me, that means standard Ardbeg 10, nam beist, or laph 10. If I'm not in the mood for the iodine but want to keep the smoke, then laph 10 is replaced by laph 18 or coal ila 12. Interestingly enough though, laga 16 doesn't make the list even though it's not cask strength, because I rarely find myself in the mood for that sweetness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alexppp Master Of Malts

Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ant wrote: | Interesting question, really speaks to our personal tastes. I simply do not enjoy non-smokey scotches the way I did when I was younger. In my early-mid 20's, I would've said Glenlivet, Glenfiddich, and Macallan. In my late 20's, Highland Park or Talisker.
But now, when I want something "ordinary" I interpret that as "smokey - not cask strength". So for me, that means standard Ardbeg 10, nam beist, or laph 10. If I'm not in the mood for the iodine but want to keep the smoke, then laph 10 is replaced by laph 18 or coal ila 12. Interestingly enough though, laga 16 doesn't make the list even though it's not cask strength, because I rarely find myself in the mood for that sweetness. |
Interesting that you say that about Lagavulin 16 and Laphroaig 10 - it surprised me because if I was ever to describe one of them as 'sweet' it would be the Laphroaig. The first time I tried them side by side I was immediately struck by a saltiness in the Lagavulin that I didn't find in the Laphroaig. In fact one of the reasons I drink less Laphroaig 10 now (though the Quarter Cask is a regular) is because I'm not a huge fan of that sweetness (can't really describe it - maybe reminiscent of menthol, or some kind of tea) alongside the smoke. Shows how tastes can vary from person to person! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
Ant Member

Joined: 04 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alexppp wrote: |
Interesting that you say that about Lagavulin 16 and Laphroaig 10 - it surprised me because if I was ever to describe one of them as 'sweet' it would be the Laphroaig. The first time I tried them side by side I was immediately struck by a saltiness in the Lagavulin that I didn't find in the Laphroaig. In fact one of the reasons I drink less Laphroaig 10 now (though the Quarter Cask is a regular) is because I'm not a huge fan of that sweetness (can't really describe it - maybe reminiscent of menthol, or some kind of tea) alongside the smoke. Shows how tastes can vary from person to person! |
Now that you mention it, I definitely get that tea note in Laphroaig 10 as well, but I don't mind it there. I do mind it in the laph triple wood; I really don't like that one at all.
As an aside, I find the laga 12 much more enjoyable than the 16. There's something about the 16's taste (of late, maybe the last 3 years) that seems soapy and combined with that sweetness I perceive (my definition of it, ie, an uigeadal kind of sweetness but without uigeadal finish or complexity) , I've just been turned off to the 16.
I'm with you on the saltiness, I love it (one of the reason's why I love ardbeg). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|