| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
William Administrator


Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 4059 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:50 pm Post subject: Dalwhinnie Winter's Gold NAS |
|
|
Diageo have added a new No Age Statement whisky to its Dalwhinnie core range, named Dalwhinnie Winter's Gold, which will start appearing on shelves from this month. It doesn't have the lovely touch of peat smoke the 15 has but this is a different expression, a more straight forward expression, more oaky, a very easy to drink and a very enjoyable Dalwhinnie.
Dalwhinnie Winter's Gold will be available from August in supermarkets and specialist whisky shops such as The Whisky Exchange. Matured in American and European Oak casks then bottled at 43% ABV, the RRP of the whisky in the UK is £38.
More info and my tasting note here:
www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk/dalwhinniewintersgold.htm _________________ There's no bad whisky. Just good whisky and better whisky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
Bookie Master Of Malts

Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 945
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Dalwhinnie Winters Gold sounds like it will be worth a try.
William its interesting that you say there could be a Lagavulin NAS, I have always wondered why the Lagavulin core range entry level whisky was 16 year old, a younger Lagavulin at an everyday dramming price would be very welcome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheWM Master Of Malts

Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 2037 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bookie wrote: | The Dalwhinnie Winters Gold sounds like it will be worth a try.
William its interesting that you say there could be a Lagavulin NAS, I have always wondered why the Lagavulin core range entry level whisky was 16 year old, a younger Lagavulin at an everyday dramming price would be very welcome. |
Worth a try, but again around 15% more expensive than the 15 and I doubt it will be 15% better, although will reserve judgement.
I've often thought that about Lagavulin; especially as the 12 is £30 more expensive than the 16... Whilst I put this down to it being a limited edition, it still makes me wonder... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CGRenn Master Of Malts


Joined: 09 Feb 2015 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheWM wrote: | | Bookie wrote: | The Dalwhinnie Winters Gold sounds like it will be worth a try.
William its interesting that you say there could be a Lagavulin NAS, I have always wondered why the Lagavulin core range entry level whisky was 16 year old, a younger Lagavulin at an everyday dramming price would be very welcome. |
Worth a try, but again around 15% more expensive than the 15 and I doubt it will be 15% better, although will reserve judgement.
I've often thought that about Lagavulin; especially as the 12 is £30 more expensive than the 16... Whilst I put this down to it being a limited edition, it still makes me wonder... |
I have heard ripples of this Lagavulin around the whisky community. I kinda hope it's slightly true, as I've always been head over heels for the 16 Y/O. It is expensive, and I would like a cheaper version even if it's lower age statement like what Benromach did with there honest 5 Y/O. Either way we shale see...
As for the Winters Gold, they have it in my local Morrisons.. Is it worth a go? Durys out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alexppp Master Of Malts

Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| But what makes you think a NAS Lagavulin would be cheaper than the 16 year-old? It's not like there's a similar precedent among other Diageo brands... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheWM Master Of Malts

Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 2037 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alexppp wrote: | | But what makes you think a NAS Lagavulin would be cheaper than the 16 year-old? It's not like there's a similar precedent among other Diageo brands... |
Time to stock up on the 16. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|

|
 |
opelfruit Master Of Malts

Joined: 19 Feb 2013 Posts: 1900 Location: Trapped inside this octavarium
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alexppp wrote: | | But what makes you think a NAS Lagavulin would be cheaper than the 16 year-old? It's not like there's a similar precedent among other Diageo brands... |
Ah, but it's not an entry level whisky; it's the ONLY core whisky they have. All others are special releases.
Anything older than 16 is a fortune so they not going to vat it away into a NAS, if the do a Lagavulin NAS then I'm pretty sure it'll be from under 16yo stock and come in under the 16yo price range.
Don't mind NAS peat too much, after all its more beastly when it's young and fresh. I'd buy one.
Jury is out on the Dalwhinnie. The 15yo is cracking. This has been designed wit he intention to drink chilled or from the freezer.....say what? I'm sure they know the effect low temperature has on flavour, so they are basically say that it lacks flavour, or why would you recommend chilling it down..... _________________ "Too much of anything is bad, but too much good whisky is barely enough." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gregor Master Of Malts

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 798
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does look like the supermarkets will soon have almost 100% NAS single malts on the shelves and the aged whiskies will only be found in the specialist whisky shops.
I did like the Talisker Skye but wouldn't rate it as highly as the 10 year old, and going by Williams review of the Dalwhinnie Winters Gold, it looks like this will be the same, good but not as good as the 15. As far as the RRP goes, it is all a game, over inflated prices so they can offer huge sales discounts during the busy sales seasons such as over the Christmas period and it does sound like this whisky was named to target the Christmas gift buyers. It does sound worth a try and no doubt I will pick up a bottle when I see it on offer and with an RRP of £38 I know for certain it will go on offer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alexppp Master Of Malts

Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| opelfruit wrote: | Anything older than 16 is a fortune so they not going to vat it away into a NAS, if the do a Lagavulin NAS then I'm pretty sure it'll be from under 16yo stock and come in under the 16yo price range.
Don't mind NAS peat too much, after all its more beastly when it's young and fresh. I'd buy one.
. |
Yes, I agree, but that doesn't contradict my point - I would fully expect a NAS Lagavulin to be younger than 16 years old, and I would also (sadly) expect it to be more expensive than the 16 year-old. Just like the Talisker Skye is more expensive than the 10 year-old, or indeed this new Dalwhinnie more expensive than the 15 year-old.. I like young peaty whiskies as well, but I'm not holding my breath for a NAS Lagavulin priced under the 16 year-old unfortunately.
Last edited by Alexppp on Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crane Master Of Malts

Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 1354 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I do like the Dalwhinnie 15 so I will give the new Winters Gold a go. As far as pricing it is no surprise that the new whisky is a little more expensive than the 15. It is all a game as Gregor says in his post above and I would have been more surprised if it was cheaper than the 15. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cuba Master Of Malts

Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 296
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pricing aside I will always welcome a new expression especially from a distillery which doesn't offer many expressions so a new Dalwhinnie and new Lagavulin if it happens will be very welcome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|